MyFox
 

Sagewood's Blog

by sagewood from North Carolina

Last Post 23 hours Ago


sagewood's posts about: Political

See all posts with this tag


Page 1 of 1

Does anyone know why Oprah Winfrey will not interview Sarah Palin on her show. She already had Obama on, is she being bias? Oh my, What could be the reason??

Also why does everyone say that Obama will be the first black president if he is elected? Maybe I am mistaken, wasn't his mother white? That would make him the first "mixed" president ever. Maybe it's just the way I see it!

Just for the record I am a registered republican. I do not vote as a republican, I vote with my heart,mind and knowledge of the candidate. If Hillary had been the nominee I would vote for her.But I really don't see what there is to vote for on the presidential democratic ticket.  I probably will vote for Purdue for governor.

Anyway I think Oprah should do as she says she does and "keep an open mind" and do the right thing.

What do you think??

2 Comments |  Add a Comment

 THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT////MUST READ all the way to the end ….

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Ken Blackwell - Columnist for the New York Sun 

 

It's an amazing time to be alive in America.  We're in a year of firsts in this presidential election: the first viable woman candidate; the first viable African-American candidate; and, a candidate who is the first front-running freedom fighter over 70. The next president of America will be a first.

 

We won't truly be in an election of firsts, however, until we judge every candidate by where they stand. We won't arrive where we should be until we no longer talk about skin color or gender. Now that Barack Obama steps to the front of the Democratic field, we need to stop talking about his race, and start talking about his policies and his politics.

 

The reality is this: Though the Democrats will not have a nominee until August, unless Hillary Clinton drops out, Mr. Obama is now the frontrunner, and its time America takes a closer and deeper look at him. Some pundits are calling him the next John F. Kennedy. He's not. He's the next George McGovern. And it's time people learned the facts.

 

Because the truth is that Mr. Obama is the single most liberal senator in the entire U.S. Senate. He is more liberal than Ted Kennedy, Bernie Sanders, or Mrs. Clinton.    Never in my life have I seen a presidential frontrunner whose rhetoric is so far removed from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise our taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military weakness, and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal domestic agenda, and he lost.

 

Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he's not behind in the polls. Why? Because the press has dealt with him as if he were in a beauty pageant..  Mr. Obama talks about getting past party, getting past red and blue, to lead the United States of America. But let's look at the more defined strokes of who he is underneath this superficial 'beauty.' 

 

Start with national security, since the president's most important duties are as commander-in-chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked about invading Pakistan, a nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditions with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who vows to destroy Israel and create another Holocaust; and Kim Jong II, who is murdering and starving his people, but emphasized that the nuclear option was off the table against terrorists - something no president has ever taken off the table since we created nuclear weapons in the 1940s. Even Democrats who have worked in national security condemned all of those remarks. Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our national security at risk.

 

Next, consider economic policy. For all its faults, our health care system is the strongest in the world. And free trade agreements, created by Bill Clinton as well as President Bush, have made more goods more affordable so that even people of modest means can live a life that no one imagined a generation ago. Yet Mr. Obama promises to raise taxes on 'the rich.' How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes. Prescription drugs? Raise taxes. Free college? Raise taxes. Socialize medicine? Raise taxes. His solution to everything is to have government take it over. Big Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck.

 

 

 

Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open a stadium rally by saying, 'All praise and glory to God!' but says that Christian leaders speaking for life and marriage have 'hijacked' - hijacked - Christianity. He is pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme Court justices who will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing. His spiritual leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is moving in that direction. In Illinois, he refused to vote against a statewide ban - ban - on all handguns in the state. These are radical left, Hollywood, and San Francis co values, not Middle America values.

 

The real Mr. Obama is an easy target for the general election. Mr. Obama could win if people don't start looking behind his veneer and flowery speeches. His vision of 'bringing America together' means saying that those who disagree with his agenda for America are hijackers or warmongers. Uniting the country means adopting his liberal agenda and abandoning any conflicting beliefs. 

 

But right now everyone is talking about how eloquent of a speaker he is and - yes - they're talking about his race. Those should never be the factors on which we base our choice for president. Mr. Obama's radical agenda sets him far outside the American mainstream. It's time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an election of firsts, let's first make sure we elect the person who is qualified to be our president in a nuclear age during a global civilizational war.
  
Subject: Kind of scary, wouldn't you think Remember--God is good, and is in time, on time — every  time!!!

 

If you think I am crazy,.  I'm sorry but I refuse to take a chance on the 'unknown' candidate.

 

2 Comments |  Add a Comment


>       This guy wants to be our President and control our government. Pay close
attention to the last comment!!  Below are a few lines from Obama's books "

His
words
:

 From "Dreams of My Father", He wrote,  
"I ceased to advertise my mother's race at
the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating
myself to whites."
>
"From Dreams of My Father":he wrote, 
 "I found a solace in nursing a pervasive
sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race."
>
From Dreams of My Father:He wrote,
 "There was something about him that made me
wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.

"From Dreams of My Father": He wrote ; "It remained necessary to prove which side
you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name
names."

 From Dreams of My Father:He wrote,  
"I never emulate white men and brown men
whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the black
man, son of Africa, that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself, the
attributes of Martin and Malcolm, Dubois and Mandela."

  "From Audacity of Hope":He wrote,  
 "I will stand with the Muslims should the
political winds shift in an ugly direction."

>>       

 Holy Cow !    He's lost his mind, and so has anyone that voted for him
!  Go be President of a Muslim country, then !   OR IS IT TOO LATE FOR US!!!!???
>
>    
>

4 Comments |  Add a Comment

Obama Pro-Choice-- Sen. Barack Obama (D.-Ill.) portrays himself as a thoughtful Democrat who carefully considers both sides of controversial issues, but his radical stance on abortion puts him further left on that issue than even NARAL Pro-Choice America. In 2002, as an Illinois legislator, Obama voted against the Induced Infant Liability Act, which would have protected babies that survived late-term abortions. That same year a similar federal law, the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, was signed by President Bush. Only 15 members of the U.S. House opposed it, and it passed the Senate unanimously on a voice vote. Both the Illinois and the federal bill sought equal treatment for babies who survived premature inducement for the purpose of abortion and wanted babies who were born prematurely and given lifesaving medical attention. When the federal bill was being debated, NARAL Pro-Choice America released a statement that said, "Consistent with our position last year, NARAL does not oppose passage of the Born Alive Infants Protection Act…floor debate served to clarify the bill's intent and assure us that it is not targeted at Roe v. Wade or a woman's right to choose." But Obama voted against this bill in the Illinois senate and killed it in committee. Twice, the Induced Infant Liability Act came up in the Judiciary Committee on which he served. At its first reading he voted "present." At the second he voted "no." The bill was then referred to the senate's Health and Human Services Committee, which Obama chaired after the Illinois Senate went Democratic in 2003. As chairman, he never called the bill up for a vote. Jill Stanek, a registered delivery-ward nurse who was the prime mover behind the legislation after she witnessed aborted babies' being born alive and left to die, testified twice before Obama in support of the Induced Infant Liability Act bills. She also testified before the U.S. Congress in support of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. Stanek told me her testimony "did not faze" Obama. In the second hearing, Stanek said, "I brought pictures in and presented them to the committee of very premature babies from my neonatal resuscitation book from the American Pediatric Association, trying to show them unwanted babies were being cast aside. Babies the same age were being treated if they were wanted!" "And those pictures didn't faze him [Obama] at all," she said. At the end of the hearing, according to the official records of the Illinois State senate, Obama thanked Stanek for being "very clear and forthright," but said his concern was that Stanek had suggested "doctors really don't care about children who are being born with a reasonable prospect of life because they are so locked into their pro-abortion views that they would watch an infant that is viable die." He told her, "That may be your assessment, and I don't see any evidence of that. What we are doing here is to create one more burden on a woman and I can't support that." As a senator, Obama has opposed measures to criminalize those who transport minors across state lines for the purpose of obtaining an abortion. At a townhall meeting in Ottawa, Ill., Joanne Resendiz, a teacher and mother of five, asked him: "How are you going to vote on this, keeping in mind that 10, 15 years down the line your daughters, God forbid, could be transported across state lines?" Obama said: "The decision generally is one that a woman should make." (But we are talking about children!) Cataloguing the doubts about Obama isn't nitpicking or partisanship. It's the sort of scrutiny every presidential candidate should get. This is information that every voter deserves, and should want before making fateful decisions about this country's future. Barack Obama is showing that he's a skilled campaigner with a deeply inspirational message. His appeals to hope, to change and to less divisive politics are proving compelling and popular, as arguably they should be. Obama is poised, possibly, to be the odds-on favorite to win the Democratic Party's presidential nomination. Before that sale is made, however, voters should be looking closer and learning more about Barack Obama.
21 Comments |  Add a Comment

Continue Reading Sagewood's Blog
Page 1 of 1




sagewood

#1 Fan of Clay Aiken!! Happily married , work full time, part-time student and enjoy life. I am woman!

Member Since: 12/30/2006