MyFox
 

douglaschick21's Blog

by douglaschick21 from Greensboro

Last Post 62 days, 15 hours Ago


Iraq Vietnam ParallelI read that Nike workers in Vietnam are unhappy about the working conditions at the Nike plant "in Vietnam" and have gone on strike twice. They claim that their $1 (U.S) a day is not enough for long work day, and they want more money and treated like human-beings, not slaves.

Was not this the start of the Vietnam War, French textile workers revolting because of harsh working conditions and slave wages? Did they not want to join the communist party to be liberated? And now the communist party is the largest manufacture of textiles in the world? Does this mean that the over 40,000 Americans that lost their lives, gave their lives for nothing? Will Iraq parallel Vietnam; no matter how long we are there it will ultimately revert back to the way it was?

And finally, does it matter whether we are there for 10 years or 100; can time mask or justify our loss of live and resources?

What is your opinion regarding this?

Douglas Chick
DouglasChick@gmail.com

5 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 5
Page 1 of 1
masterson
Feb 20, 2008 | 8:19 PM

It seems every time we interfere with another society, regardless of how good intentioned we are, it end in disaster.

caddyboy read my blog view my photos
Feb 22, 2008 | 8:33 AM

I am sorry for the solders that have lost their lives and been wounded.

JQPublix read my blog view my photos
Feb 23, 2008 | 6:30 PM

I don't think Iraq will revert back to a dictatorship after we leave. There are no signs it would and although the government is coming along slowly, thats not necessarily a bad thing. Let them make their mistakes while we are there.

Now, if we pull out to soon the country will go haywaire again as they are invaded by Iran.

Axekick read my blog view my photos
Feb 23, 2008 | 11:36 PM

I agree with you there masterson! And most times we back the wrong side!

UncommonValor
Feb 24, 2008 | 6:04 PM

The reason that it ends in disaster if that when we go to war, we don't go to war. All the so called wars (actually conflicts) since the second world war has been controlled by civilians (read non-combat trained and non-combat oriented). War, as they say, is hell. To wage it, one must be willing to kill or die. The civilians that have controlled all of our wars rely on advice from non-combat people (political science in universities are adept at teaching "how to get along with your neighboring coutries"). I have no problem with civilians trying to solve things. But, when you have failed and then you decide to send in the military, then get the hell out of the way and let the military do what they are trained for: COMBAT and loose the dogs of war. Do not make them policemen of the world. They are not trained for law enforcement ideals. Their main mission is to seek out, locate, close with and destroy the enemy. Let them do their job.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




douglaschick21

My name is Douglas Chick, author, computer engineer, and creator of www.TheNetworkAdministrat
or.com a popular website for computer people.

Member Since: 1/27/2008