MyFox
 

Patch_W_Adams's St Louis Blog

by Patch_W_Adams from St Louis

Last Post 3 days, 11 hours Ago


I am a Blogger based out of St. Louis.  I am posting this question on different Blogs in about 21 States so as to Gauge if indeed it is time again for the People to Form a Continental Congress. 

The Government is Growing at an enormous rate, much larger than the Founding Fathers ever intended.   Individual Liberties and Freedoms have been under repeated attacks from the very Government sworn to protect them.  The politicians in Office appear to only take turns playing "King" in the White House while Ignoring the Outcries of their Bosses, we Citizens.

Is it time to Elect Delegations from the States to Discuss how to Return this Great Country to the Path of the Constitution?

So that this Great Nation of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

7 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 7
Page 1 of 1
nativephoenician read my blog
Jul 9, 2008 | 12:48 PM

A PERFECT SUMMATIOIN OF WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS COUNTRY.

I really tried to find something in this that I did not agree with, but could not. Also, I felt that everything that is written in this supports my own view, that we need term limits and that includes both democrats and republicans. One term and they are out, they spend not one day in office running for re-election. Maybe then, decisions will be made based on what is good and right and the constitution. I hope we wake up before it is too late. Factual, Accurate, Truthful and Pitiful! Just plain pitiful.

RE-ELECT NOBODY! Worthy of your time and attention regardless of your Party Affiliation. 545 Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them. Have you ever wondered why? If both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, why do we have deficits? Have you ever wondered why, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, then why do we have inflation and high taxes? You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does. You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does. You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does. You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does. You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does. One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices – 545 human beings out of the 300 million – are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this cou

nativephoenician read my blog
Jul 9, 2008 | 12:49 PM

country. I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank. I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce(loose term) a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes. Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is NOT THEIR FAULT. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party. What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it. The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? She is the leader of the majority party. She and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to. It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can

nativephoenician read my blog
Jul 9, 2008 | 12:50 PM

not replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of INCOMPETENCE AND IRRESPONSIBILITY. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist. If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair. If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red. If the Marines are in IRAQ, it's because they want them in IRAQ. If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way. There are no insoluble government problems. Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do. Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible. They, and they alone, have the power. They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are THEIR BOSSES – provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees. We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

CAN I GET AN AMEN!!!.
nativephoenician Phoenix, AZ.

nativephoenician read my blog
Jul 9, 2008 | 1:24 PM

if my last post doesnt just chap your hide, maybe this will get you to ACT NOW!!!

There is this company that employ's 535 employee's. Of those employee's

29 are jearking thier bosses around. 7 have been convicted and served time for fraud. 19 have bounced checks. 117 have bankrupted 2 companys (each). 3 have been convicted and served time for assult. 7 can not even get a visa/mastercard because they have bad credit. 14 have drug convictions, YES THAT CONVICTIONS. 8 have shoplifting convictions. 21 are current defendants for law suits against them. and here is the kicker, 84 have been arrested THIS YEAR for DUI.

What company do you think hires such awful people? We do, that's right you and me!!! For this bunch of LOSERS belongs to.......THE U.S. CONGRESS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nancy Pelosi and her brood have the odasity to try and take away my right to own a gun, they continueally want to raise my taxes and give themselves big fat pay increases, they refuse to take responsibility to protect me and my family through our open borders, they don't do the job they promised while getting themselves elected, and this is the example they set?

HOW DARE THEM.
ARE YOU PISSED OFF ENOUGH TO ACT YET!!!
YOU SHOULD BE

shabanozz read my blog view my photos
Jul 10, 2008 | 12:59 PM

Where do I sign up?

nativephoenician read my blog
Jul 10, 2008 | 7:19 PM

www.contcongress.blogspot.com

Patch_W_Adams read my blog
Jul 13, 2008 | 6:17 PM

Shabanozz I am currently working on a Website and a Petition I hope to have up very soon. We are in the Stage of Organizing since this was a Good Idea Born of Frustration and Anger at the Continued Infringment of the Federal Government.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Patch_W_Adams

www.poedpatriot.blogspot.
com......................
"But war, in a good cause, is not the greatest evil which a nation can suffer. War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks nothing worth a war, is worse. When a people are used as mere human instruments for firing cannon or thrusting bayonets, in the service and for the selfish purposes of a master, such war degrades a people. A war to protect other human beings against tyrannical injustice – a war to give victory to their own ideas of right and good, and which is their own war, carried on for an honest purpose by their free choice – is often the means of their regeneration. A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. As long as justice and injustice have not terminated their ever-renewing fight for ascendancy in the affairs of mankind, human beings must be willing, when need is, to do battle for the one against the other." - John Stuart Mill

Member Since: 4/30/2008