MyFox
 

Leah_Beno's Blog

by Leah_Beno

Last Post 4 days, 12 hours Ago


The debate over this story really got some people going in our newsroom tonight. Here's the story in a nutshell... Is a play which includes the F-word, S-word, lots of profanity, and sexual content appropriate when it's being performed by high school students? It depends on who you ask.

Apparently the drama teacher at Southwest High School in High Point thought the script entitled "Shape of Things" was a good choice for students ranging from 9th grade to 12th grade. The students practiced an edited version of the play for weeks, without the school principal or any other school officials knowing what it was about. Even with some editing the play included plenty of profanity and sexual references. The students performed "The Shape of Things" for the first (and only) time last weekend. A group of about 40 students and parents were not warned about the explicit content they were about to witness. The movie version of the play is rated "R."

School Board Member,Garth Hebert, is appalled. He has a son who attends Southwest High School, and says this is not the type of play that should be representing the school or Guilford County Schools. Neither the principal or Garth Hebert attend the performance, but they don't like what they've heard.

The principal, Alan Parker, immediately stopped performances of the play from continuing. That means the students will not perform at the annual state competition as planned. From now on Parker has made it school policy to personally approve all scripts to be performed at the school.

So what do you think? Some students we talked to admit they use profanity everyday, so hearing it in play is not a big deal. While other students admit such a script chosen by a teacher is inappropriate. And should the drama teacher who chose this play be punished?

Here's a link to the original script of "The Shape of Things." The version students at Southwest performed did include some editing.

www.script-o-rama.com/movie_scripts/s/shape-of-thing
s-script.html.

19 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 19
Page 1 of 1
JenCinC
Oct 27, 2007 | 7:52 AM

I totally agree with Mr. Hebert and Mr. Parker. This play is totally uncalled for in our schools, and personally, I think the drama teacher should be reprimanded. Very poor judgement, indeed, and if this drama teacher allowed this to happen on stage in our school I just wonder what kind of perverted person this is around our children behind the scenes.

homeschoolmom read my blog view my photos
Oct 27, 2007 | 9:42 AM

I agree that they should not continue with the showing of this play. I am surprised that noone knew the content until after the students had been practicing for several weeks. Seems to me that this type of thing should have to be approved by more than one person before the play is even brought before the drama students. I am glad the principal has stopped this play, but he should have never let it in the school in the first place. As for the drama teacher, I think she should have used better judgement. There needs to be some type of guidelines that they must follow so this doesn't happen again.

flatch read my blog view my photos
Oct 27, 2007 | 10:31 AM

The school administration, the parents, the Port Authority and Good Housekeeping should have shut down this play. I mean, why remind the parents and the school system about what the kids are doing every day while Dad is in front of the computer trading fantasy football players and Mom has her head in the oven?

C'mon - the schools can't keep guns out, can't keep students from beating each other to a pulp or keep them from making summer honey in the nurse's office. So, let's show that the administration has some power! Let's cancel a play! Ooo-rah! Then, let's go home and watch Californication and Weeds on the TV!

I fear I have to issue another Sheesh!

moonandstars2007
Oct 27, 2007 | 1:34 PM

I honestly think that everyone is completely overreacting. I was a part of this ensemble for two years in high school and know the amount of work that these students were going through in preparation for state competition. I was very unimpressed with the fact that no students who were actually in the play were interviewed and the administration banned something that they haven't even seen.
The students should have the opportunity to sit down with the principle and cut out what he feels in inappropriate. I understand that people were offending but the students did not say the f word on stage and penis is a word of anatomy and is allowed to be used on a high school stage. I believe that it is a shame that the program did not include a mature themes warning so that people knew what they were getting into however students here this stuff everyday. The teacher should of also had the play approved before, however, he might have had the impression that it wasn’t necessary because the school had already had the rights to the play and that was one of the reasons why he chose it.
Two of the actors are seniors and will never have that opportunity to be in the state competition ever again. One senior is experiencing his first main stage role and now its being taken away from him. He can never get that back. I understand why it is being banned but again I don’t think that 3 months of work should just be thrown away.
I am glad that the principle is now going to approve all of the shows, so next time when a parent does get offended it will be on him. I just cannot str

moonandstars2007
Oct 27, 2007 | 1:35 PM

I just cannot stress how much work was put into this show and these students are crushed. They need to sit down together and put a censored script that the principle feels is appropriate. The students should not be punished for their teacher’s ignorance.

~Katie

SocAware
Oct 27, 2007 | 3:59 PM

First of all, maybe the parents should have consulted the principal and the drama teacher before calling radio stations and fox news about their views on this play. Parents today would rather call their politicians than have a simple conversation with their child's teacher about artistic differences. It is also interesting how the principal didn't read the play when the teacher asked him to read and approve it. This play has been done in high schools and competitions before, and the teacher was well aware of this precedent. So, as usual, the community and administration failed a teacher who is just trying to open the minds of their children and actually try to address relevant social topics in the world. Instead of recognizing this failure, what do they do? They do what they always do; place all the blame on the teacher.

machman read my blog
Oct 27, 2007 | 4:03 PM

If the name of "Jesus" had been mentioned in this play you can bet that this production would'nt even been performed. Plus we would'nt be having this discussion.

seaangelrainqueen read my blog view my photos
Oct 27, 2007 | 5:22 PM

This is ridiculous! If a student were to mention any of these words, they would be put in detention, if not expelled from school. This is not an appropriate play to perform in a high school, where parents would be bringing younger siblings of the actors/actresses to see the performance. What a student says off school grounds is not the issue, this is what the drama department wants to be acted out on a "HIGH SCHOOL" stage. NO, this is totally inappropriate for high school material, period.

moonandstars2007
Oct 27, 2007 | 5:44 PM

You do not even what words were said unless you saw the show! The script was edited! Yes, there was some language however, there are words that can be said on a high school stage and not be said in a high school environment because they are ACTING! They are portraying another character, not themselves. If you are basing your opinion on the unedited script then you have faulty evidence because the script was edited and I am sick of people chastising art when they never take the initiative to view it themselves. Again, I understand why it was pulled but I believe that the students should be able to edit the script to the principles standards because of the work that they put into this show in the first place.

northdavidsondad read my blog view my photos
Oct 28, 2007 | 10:41 AM

I think the teacher is the one to put ALL the blame on. This teacher knew that there was profanity in this play, and this teacher still decided to do it. Some kind of punishment should be taken, whether it be suspension w/o pay or something. Ain't teachers supposed to be some kind of role model? The principal should have asked to see the script from the beginning, but I guess he figured the teacher would use better judgment. This reminds me of when I was in high school, we had a talent show. A group of guys was going to do a rap song, and they rehearsed a clean song during tryouts. When it came time for the talent show, they did a totally different rap song that talked about sex. Needless to say, after their performance, they were taken to the principal's office and suspended. How many parents was at this play and had their small children? After all, children imitate what they see and hear. Maybe the next time, the teacher will use better judgment!!!!!!!

TJMac
Oct 28, 2007 | 3:14 PM

Using profanity and anatomically correct terms for human body parts in high school is an outrgage!!! If we allow this to continue, they may want to play that rock and roll music at the prom, let girls wear dresses above their shins, or even worse, allow the girls to wear pants!!! It also shouldn't matter that the harshest critics never saw the play, our hard-earned tax money pays their salaries and we expect them to be presumptious, judgemental and narrow-minded. How dare that drama teacher think he/she knew the students and their maturity level well enough to choose a play that some would find controversial, but trusted the kids to "act" like adults. I wonder what they used for inspiration?

ABarbry
Oct 28, 2007 | 4:48 PM

People honestly need to grow up. I have been apart of this ensemble at southwest for two years, walking around school we hear the same words everyday. This is ludicrous we should not be punished and neither should our teacher. If we couldn't handle the subject matter we would of said so.

prongs_407
Oct 28, 2007 | 7:28 PM

Some editing? There was TONS of editing. I was helping back stage, and yes, some words were used, but nothing outrageous! Those who are agreeing with the principal probably haven't even seen it. If you haven't seen the play, you have no right to tell us what happened was wrong, BECAUSE YOU WEREN'T THERE TO SEE IT! People need to grow up. We're not in elementary school where we hear a bad word and don't know how to handle it.

Dish22
Oct 28, 2007 | 8:11 PM

This whole thing is getting blown way out of propotion. I was part of the crew, and we worked hard and did LOADS of editing. This play was very different from the original script. It was not a rated X play and it was not promoting any kind of profanity. Yes there was profanity, and a few curse words(by the way the "f-word" was not used if recall correctly). But this was not for elementary school, or middle school, it was for hgh school and people need to grow up. Go see any PG-13 movie and I can almost guarantee you'll find way more profanity and sexual references. The teacher should not be punished under any circumstances, and unless you saw the play there is NO WAY you can tell anybody how inappropriate it was. If the principal didn't think that people could handle it, then it's his fault for not caring about the drama program and looking at the play or talking to the teacher or even being half way aware of what it was about. I guess people were so busy going crazy over 3-second kisses on stage and a few cursing, they failed to see the message of the entire play, which is a positive one. The play was trying to get people not to change yourself by surgery, unhealthy pills etc. to try and fit the "holywood image" which is anorexic women and 800 dollar jeans, but be happy with who you are. I guess no one saw that part of the play. People and parents need to stop pretending like at the high-school level kids aren't exposed to bad language and sexual references. GO see the play YOURSELF and then tell me if it was inappropriate!

goharvick1 read my blog view my photos
Oct 29, 2007 | 10:23 AM

as dish22 said, thre are rated pg-13 movies out there that kids in middle school and some in elementary school go see all the time. and i know for a fact they don't edit the bad words. and i have seen some with partial nudity. i thought high school was to prepare our children to grow up and be a part of society. how are they gonna do that if we shield them from everything and every word. 80% of these kids probably hear or use these words every day! and i guarantee you they aren't saying "penis". if anyone is to blame it should be the principal for not doing his job and reading the play before approving it. i do agree there should have been some kind of warning for parents who brought small children, but again had the principal done his/ her job and read it we wouldn't be having this discussion. but hey , just an opinion.

sirwilliam read my blog
Oct 29, 2007 | 2:43 PM

If this is an example of what our children are being taught, no wander more parents are "home-schooling" their children! What's next- Baby-making 101? From what I see, that's already being taught!!

slfarr78 read my blog
Oct 29, 2007 | 3:39 PM

Goharvick1 said "i thought high school was to prepare our children to grow up and be a part of society. how are they gonna do that if we shield them from everything and every word."

This reminded me of a conversation I overhead a couple of months ago as I was sitting outside of Starbucks. There were 2 high school girls sitting at the table beside me having a conversation about being in high school. It was easy to figure at that one of the girls attended a local private Christian school. The other had apparently just started a public school after attending the same private Christian school. The one girl told the other how is was so glad she got out of the private school. She went on to say that many of her former fellow classmates are not going to be able to handle the real world when they face it because they are so protected and shielded from how society really functions.

The most influential "teachers" to teenagers are other teenagers. I'm pretty sure that teenagers are already aware of "bad" words and how to make babies. I'm not sure shielding teenagers from these "bad" things is the best route to take. I think it's pretty obvious from the posts made from teens who actually worked on the play that they were mature enough to handle what they were doing. It is ashame that these kids worked so hard on something they believed in, that obviously has a good message, and now all that hard work will not be seen.

caddyboy read my blog view my photos
Nov 1, 2007 | 4:06 PM

I have read the script. It is totally not worthy of a production. The parents of the kids that act in this farce should be ashamed.
This is not acceptable.

caddyboy read my blog view my photos
Nov 2, 2007 | 7:56 AM

Folks,
This is not about what our children hear or know as the rude crude language goes. This is about integrity and decency. If we allow this garbage to be taught in the guise of acting it will give the media and Hollywood more ammunition to use against or kids. Then they (afore mentioned) can justify their trash that they put into our society. So this is just a trick.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Leah_Beno

I am a Fox 8 News Reporter...and loving it!!!

Member Since: 5/3/2007