MyFox
 

Julie-Luck's Blog

by Julie-Luck from FOX8 News Room

Last Post 3 days, 4 hours Ago


Paying your dues.  Earning your stripes.  Climbing the ladder.  Whatever you want to call it, success comes after plenty of hard work and investing lots of time.

Let's take doctors for example.  In order to practice medicine, they must receive an undergraduate degree, go to medical school, complete an internship, suffer through residency, and pass the difficult medical boards.  This grueling process takes years and not everyone can rise to the challenge.

I know I am comparing apples to oranges but there's a similar process for broadcast journalists.  Take my friend and colleague, Neill McNeill for example.  After graduating from UNC in the 1980's, he started his journalism career at WGHP as a general assignment reporter.  He's worn many hats since then... as weekend, morning and noon anchor and now primary anchor.  For more than two decades, Neill worked his way up at WGHP and continued to be promoted by proving himself as a serious journalist, gaining the trust of viewers, and earning their respect.

There's a woman who recently was awarded the same title of Anchor.  Her name is Lauren Jones, the 'star' of the reality show Anchorwoman which will make its debut tonight.  Her experience:  former wrestler and bikini model.  She has no background in television news except for the fact that she's been on TV before. 

Is this fair?  What do the other employees at the station in Tyler, TX think about Ms. Jones catapulting her way to the top of the ranks, without any experience? 

I'm sure at some point in your life, you've been passed over for a job by someone who had less experience than you. It's happened to me.  And it sure doesn't feel good. 

According to the reviews, Ms. Jones apparently has some talent, which is fortunate since she has said that she wants to continue a career in TV News.  She is lucky to be given this rare opportunity as a beginner.  Most likely, she will become an instant star thanks to the reality show, but she can't become an instant credible journalist.  That takes years.

13 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 13
Page 1 of 1
homeschoolmom read my blog view my photos
Aug 22, 2007 | 6:14 PM

I agree she will need experience to become a credible journalist. That is the thing about this type of show. I love watching American Idol, but they don't have to go through what other singers have to go through. They work hard, but the label and all is pretty much handed to them. Then they have to go out and prove themselves or they won't make it. Ms. Jones will have to prove herself as well.

ChrisSparks read my blog view my photos
Aug 23, 2007 | 5:13 AM

Hey Julie,

I think your topic is actually at the core of one of the biggest problems in America right now and is certainly one of my biggest hot buttons. Fame is being equated with talent. People believe what they see, hear and read in the media which makes this incredibly ironic doesn't it?! :) The last thing this country needs is another journalist who is in it for fame. We need real journalists who ask the tough questions, report about stories that actually matter, present a balanced view and take their responsibility seriously. These are principles obviously valued by the Fox 8 Team. So, I understand and share your concern.

But here's another point to think about. Consider the job requirements for any entry level job. Then, consider that those requirements are tougher than the job requirements to be President of the United States. Shouldn't it at least be on the level of the CEO of a major corporation? Should we not be taking these things more seriously?

But to be fair, does someone winning a TV singing competition mean that person should immediately be taken seriously as a recording artist and considered for serious awards against artists who earned their position with years of work. We see stories that the artist "went platinum". No, the show, network, producers, songwriters and everybody else involved with the project earned another platinum album. The singer just won a contest and became famous. Like the journalist needs to prove her credibility, the artist needs to prove that he/she can sell albums based on talent and not massive weekly TV ex

ChrisSparks read my blog view my photos
Aug 23, 2007 | 5:14 AM

...weekly TV exposure. So, let's measure their success 3 to 5 years out. While choosing our recording artists is not as crucial as choosing our journalists or leaders, it's still a major issue, especially for recording artists. Just like serious journalists don't want an EMMY to be awarded unless of course it is earned based on merit, I don't want to see an RIAA Gold/Platinum Award or Grammy Award be awarded unless it is based on merit either. Otherwise, it dilutes the value.

It's as unrealistic as believing that someone surviving on a reality TV show island will be able to survive if they were actually stranded. It's not to cut these shows down. They just need to be taken for what they are, entertainment.

I think the main problem is that this is a fairly new phenomena for our culture with the popularity of "Reality TV". I think people's opinions are changing because they have now seen behind the curtain for the first time. More importantly, they are now seeing the results of taking the shows too seriously and giving no consideration to the industries they are based on. There is nothing wrong with these shows. There is something wrong with our reaction to them though. It is entertainment pure and simple. If we get a good entertainer, movie director or journalist, that is great. If people get their shot at their dream, I'm all for it. But, winning the contest should only give you the shot to earn your place, not immediately place you on top. So, let's stop assuming that fame equals talent or quality.

Chris

poteatlee read my blog
Aug 23, 2007 | 2:13 PM

Julie welcome to North Carolina. Please keep up the good work.

Nature_Boy read my blog view my photos
Aug 23, 2007 | 3:34 PM

To be honest, as long as Lauren Jones is objective, then she'll be a credible journalist. I've seen many veteran journalists who are not objective, so they are not credible to me. I guess credibility is in the eye of the beholder.

Neill_McNeill read my blog view my photos
Aug 23, 2007 | 4:44 PM

Just for everyone's information, as of this afternoon, Thursday August 23rd, the Fox Network has cancelled "Anchorwoman." The remaining four episodes will not air.

FOX8WebTeam read my blog view my photos
Aug 23, 2007 | 6:40 PM

For those of you in shock over the cancellation of Anchorwoman, I may be able to offer some consolation and hope. I suspect -- although I'm not 100% sure -- that you'll be able to catch the remaining episodes online at FOX on Demand. That seems to be FOX's (and other networks') modus operandi for canceled shows.

Keep an eye on http://streaming.myfoxwghp.com for the episodes. I'll try to remember to post here when I see them up. Again, no promises.

flatch read my blog view my photos
Aug 24, 2007 | 10:56 AM

Jeff would have gladly paid his dues in the broadcasting game...had someone told him where to send the check. Sadly, he sent a check to a broadcasting school - that "certificate" and a dime got me a nickel.

Notwithstanding that, he held on to hope until he learned that a 9-year-old girl was slated to do the sports during morning drive-time in Boston - if I'm not mistaken, that's a major market. So, as Hawkeye wanted to do in M*A*S*H, I 'hung up that certificate in the latrine and opened a hot dog stand'.

So, for those viewers at home, if you or a loved one wants to go into broadcasting, take a tip from someone who knows:

Don't try it unless you have:
College
Clout (It ain't what you know, it's who you know) or
"Cutes" (like that 9-y/o in Beantown).

Trust me...

sniffledorf
Sep 7, 2007 | 12:38 PM

testing login

sniffledorf
Sep 7, 2007 | 12:50 PM

RE: “Anchorwoman” sniffledorf Blog Discussion Fox 8 WGHP

This is an interesting topic. It smacks of the struggle between what is right and which is wrong... are ethics that vague? It chokes the sciences of sociology and psychology with examples of real life human interface transparencies. Just what are the incentives for the prize, and which are the prizes?

For every person’s effort put forth there are results expected, and that is how it is taught and this is how we assume, but let’s be honest with ourselves. An individual with such ethic might abide by this principle and profit from it in some way, but the market does not necessarily agree. The market insists it will always march to its own beat and carry its own variable definitions of right versus wrong. The market applies the definition of choice when the time is correct, and accordingly. The market can be fickle. The market does not insist we agree.

Beside the responsibility and noble citizenship of local TV, newspapers, and media as a whole, the attentions of the masses, of who make up the market, are the ultimate prize to the media. The burden of right versus wrong is weighty, and yet the attentions are the prize.

The market is the prize for all merchants via advertisers, advertisers via celebrities; attention via attention-getters.

What is good, honest, ethical attention-deserving product when no one is paying attention? Marketers and merchants struggle to answer this and strive to produce results under this dark cloud, and competition is fierce.

Yes, let us remain honest. The waters of the real

sniffledorf
Sep 7, 2007 | 12:54 PM

Yes, let us remain honest. The waters of the real life science of marketing can be relatively deep, but then… the lure of success oftentimes lures marketers to fish in shallower waters.

When I was a kid we fished the shallow waters… when the tide was in… for flounder. We came for flounder, we used the right lures, and we caught a bunch of flounder.

sniffledorf
Sep 7, 2007 | 2:12 PM

RE: “Anchorwoman” sniffledorf Blog Discussion Fox 8 WGHP

Next I want to comment on Julie’s comment:

“I'm sure at some point in your life, you've been passed over for a job by someone who had less experience than you. It's happened to me. And it sure doesn't feel good.” (J.Luck, http://community.myfoxwghp.com/blogs/ViewBlogEntry.aspx
?entry_id=162682&blog_id=757 )

I do not know how chronic this “disease” is in other countries, or even within the USA as a whole, but I have experienced this… even recently. Some have said: “It’s not what you know, it’s WHO you know”, and so the potentially deep waters of America run continue to run shallow.

I decided to partner with a company and share the wealth of my years of experience, while wanting to continue to grow and learn even more, and found myself “passed over”. Thankfully, I am self employed and so this did not cause too much a problem for me… but for the company?

That decision was, in all actuality, a complete mistake for that company. I have associates within the company, and so I learned recent results.

The company immediately suffered with numerous failures as a direct result of allowing the wrong person to make the wrong decisions. After measurable mistakes… in the thousands of dollars of direct losses, that person is still there and still damaging the company, negatively affecting the staff, and bases all decisions on inept egocentricity and various experience nothingness.
To be continued...

sniffledorf
Sep 7, 2007 | 2:14 PM

RE: “Anchorwoman” sniffledorf Blog Discussion Fox 8 WGHP

“You reap what you sow” is another old saying. The company will receive a result of each and every decision made, be it a good one, or a bad one.

Why did the unqualified, inept and unethical individual get the partnership? I think the answer is simple, and quite clear.

The unqualified, inept and unethical individual got the partnership because he knows how to “blow smoke”, and the individuals within the company charged with the selection process believed him.

Now, granted... this is no beauty issue such as with “Anchorwoman”, but still relative. And smoke is all they get. Sooner or later someone is going to choke.

Whose fault is it? Is it the fault of the unscrupulous partner who needed a job? Or is it the unqualified decision maker that chose the unqualified, inept individual?

Amazingly, when all is said and done, it is good. I do not wish to share in their failure.

HA! I’m done now.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Julie-Luck

I am "lucky" to work with the most respected names in television news in the Piedmont, such as veterans Neill McNeill, Van Denton and Rich Brenner. As co-anchor of the FOX 8 5:00, 6:00 and 10:00 Newscasts, our job is to inform you with the news you need to know and what interests you most. Many of our stories come from your ideas. We are here to help so I encourage you to give your feedback. Setting the formalities aside, I'm originally from "The O.C." in California. After working as Anchor/Reporter in five TV stations across the country in the past decade, it's relieving to settle in the beautiful and lush North Carolina. If I'm not exploring the area, you can find me trying new restaurants or jogging with my barky, but loveable dog. During my downtime, I continue to search for a remedy to de-frizz my hair caused by the humidity, shop for television clothes that are not my favorite basic (but boring) black, and decide whether or not to wear my glasses.

Member Since: 7/17/2006