Alan_H's posts about:
Political
See all posts with this tag
| Page 1 of 2 |
1 |
2 |
 |
Last |
"There are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why. I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?"
Robert F. Kennedy's words have greatly influenced my life. That quote in particular, which Kennedy paraphrased from George Bernard Shaw, taught me how to think.
On June 5, 1968, I had just finished the fifth grade and was watching the California primary results on a black & white TV at our home in Wichita, Kansas (even at age 11, I was destined to be a geek).
I remember thinking 'oh no, not again,' the same thought that hit most Americans when they heard the news.
Bobby was the dreamer. Bobby was, and is, my hero. Not only did he oppose the Vietnam War, he was intent on solving and defeating poverty within the world's richest nation.
"I believe that, as long as there is plenty, poverty is evil," he said.
I don't spend much time thinking about what an RFK presidency could have achieved. It was not a certainty he would win his own party's nomination. RFK had the momentum, but Vice-President Hubert Humphrey had the LBJ machine behind him. Despite the convention outcome, we all thought he would be killed before ever reaching the White House.
He was a complicated man, yet when his brother Ted eulogized Bobby so simply:
"He saw wrong and tried to right it. He saw suffering and tried to heal it. He saw war and tried to stop it."
Author Thurston Clarke defined RFK's campaign style as "Jazz Politics." RFK was so well entrenched in his ideas and ideals, he could talk extemporaneously about any subject for any length of time. Name a politician today who could pull that off.
His 82 day campaign, as the title of Clarke's book so well describes, inspired America. Ronald Reagan in 1980, Bill Clinton in 1992 and Barack Obama's current campaign are the closest we have seen to capturing the magic. The Obama movement has their heart in the right place, but there's something missing.
For a nation in turmoil (race, war, poverty), June 5, 1968 was the day the music died. The themes are still playing. When will we get it right? RFK taught us the idea of wanting to improve is a good first step, but, like anything of value, you have to work for it.
We still haven't figured out as a nation what RFK saw in us forty years ago. We owe it to ourselves to keep on trying.
An Odd Couple
Jun 3, 2008 | 7:59 PM PST
Category:
Political
We've been waiting for this night to come for weeks (or months). Barack Obama has won enough delegates to clinch the democratic presidential nomination. Looking back, the wind in Hillary Clinton's campaign sails was lost May 6.
North Carolina voters, despite a fast and furious courtship by Hillary, Bill and Chelsea, resoundingly decided the future is Obama. Combining those results with a much too close win in Indiana determined how this race would end. She continued to move forward, but never closed the delegate gap.
Many criticized Hillary for not ending her campaign before now, but I don't. You play the game until it's over.
We had a lively debate in the newsroom this afternoon when AP broke the story Hillary would be open to becoming Obama's running mate. The majority felt her quickness to accept second fiddle was akin to placing a large anvil around Obama's neck. I (always the ornery one) believe she has to entertain the offer, whether it's formally offered to her or not.
Barack Obama changed the dynamic of this year's campaign though voter registration and grass roots fund raising. Hillary gets a lot of her support from Hispanics and middle-class white men and women, votes from demographics both parties covet.
There have been stranger pairings than Obama/Clinton. In 1960, John F. Kennedy chose Lyndon Johnson because Kennedy knew he couldn't win the South without him. Ronald Reagan went with George H.W. Bush 20 years later, the strongest of the rest of the GOP field (although I can't imagine any running mate dragging down Reagan in 1980).
Obama needs the Clinton family Rolodex. He and Hillary have to work together for practical reasons. I believe she can help him without being his running mate. Stranger things have happened. Stay tuned.
Off the Charts Optimism
May 29, 2008 | 4:50 PM PST
Category:
Political
We receive
a lot of e-mails every day. They range
from viewers providing news tips and story idea suggestions to news releases
and a fair amount of spam. Because I'm a
political geek, I also receive e-mails from most political campaigns.
You can
learn how well organized a candidate's campaign is by how quickly they respond
to an issue, stay on message and shape the debate.
I received
an e-mail this week from Chelsea Clinton (you know, Hillary's daughter) that
seems so far out of left field, I have to share with you.
Here is
the e-mail:

Dear Friend,
We need your help to make a critical decision -- our next official campaign
t-shirt.
We recently launched a contest to design a campaign t-shirt, and I couldn't
believe the incredible response. We got thousands of great entries. They were
creative, inspirational, funny, and beautiful. It was amazing to see the
devotion to my mom's campaign come through in each t-shirt. Thank you to
everyone who submitted a design!
It wasn't easy to narrow it down, but we've chosen five we think are
particularly great, and now we need your help in making our final decision.
Please vote for your favorite design -- the winning shirt will go on sale in
our online campaign store.
Please click here to see the finalists and vote for your
favorite.
Thanks again for everything you're doing to help my mom!
Go Hillary!
Chelsea
The
campaign's optimism is stunning. The
race between Hillary and Barack Obama could very well end in the next few days
(I'll admit, how many times have you heard that since the Iowa caucuses). This is drink the grape Kool-Aid optimism. You almost have to admire this train of
thinking because of its focus.
Am I a
jaded journalist, missing the big picture, on point, all or none of the above?
Governor's Race Stew
Apr 29, 2008 | 10:07 PM PST
Category:
Political
I've been simmering over the governor's candidates for some time, letting it marinate, or 'get happy' in Emeril Lagasse terms. The real choice is not on May 6, but in November. That's when we'll see true differences between the party nominees.
Everyone says they loathe negative campaign ads, but they work. Just ask Secretary of State Richard Moore. He has closed the race between himself and Lieutenant Governor Bev Perdue down to single digits. Perdue, hoping to generate good will among voters (and stop her sliding poll numbers) publically denounced negative ads, vowing only to run positive ads during the last weeks of the primary.
Last week's face-to-face debate between the two candidates was far more cordial than contentious, taking the "let's all get along" mantra to new levels. Both Perdue and Moore said they would whole-heartedly support the democrat party's nominee for governor, and they seemed to mean it, but you just felt neither thought for a minute they would lose.
Each of the four main republican candidates can't seem to agree enough on every issue. Illegal immigration seems to be the only area where there is a slight difference of opinion, with the emphasis on slight. Charlotte Mayor Pat McCrory has raised the most money, based on the latest campaign finance reports. State Senator Fred Smith, Salisbury attorney Bill Graham and former state Supreme Court Justice Bob Orr have respectably raised and spent the least. McCrory is the only candidate who has not loaned money to his campaign. Part of that can be attributed to not entering the race until a few months ago,
The real race won't begin until after the republican runoff. Then we'll see how desperately democrats want to keep the governor's mansion and how republicans want to begin a new era.
What's the Hurry?
Apr 29, 2008 | 12:04 AM PST
Category:
Political
What's all the hurry about getting democratic superdelegates
to make up their minds?
Howard Dean, Democratic National Committee Chairman said
Monday that either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama must drop out of the race
after the last primary June 3. He also
said that while the rules specify superdelegates can wait until the convention begins
(Aug. 25) to choose a candidate, they too, should also decide by June. All, Dean said, in order to unify the party
and defeat John McCain in November.
My first thought is of Will Rogers' famous quote "I am not a member of any organized political party. I am a Democrat."
Seriously, what's the hurry?
Democrats rarely decide on their party's presidential nominee before
June. In 2004, John Kerry was the
presumptive nominee by March, and that didn't exactly help them win in
November.
In 1976, President Gerald Ford won the GOP nomination over
Ronald Reagan by about 100 delegates. Ford
trailed Carter by double digits after the GOP convention, yet came within 47
electoral votes (Ford won 27 states, compared to Carter's 23 plus DC.) of
winning.
Granted, the Ford administration suffered from post
traumatic Watergate disorder, but most historians believe (as did Ford) the
election was lost because Reagan, although while endorsing Ford, did not actively
campaign for the President. Had Reagan
given a moderate effort, history could've been changed.
There is virtually no chance democrats will not fully get
behind this year's nominee. A wild card
in the equation is whether Obama supporters, a large number of them first time
voters, will be as enthusiastic if he's on the top of the ticket.
Besides, doesn't anyone remember the last season of The West
Wing? Texas Congressman Matt Santos won
the democratic presidential nomination on the fourth ballot at the convention
then defeated California Republican Senator Arnold Vinnick to succeed President
Josiah Bartlett. The feeling that no matter which candidate claimed victory, America was the winner. Too bad that was fiction.
John Edwards, former U.S. Senator from North Carolina, ended his presidential run on
January 30. He ended his campaign in New Orleans' Ninth Ward,
the same place where he announced his second run for president on December 27,
2006.
A day or two after dropping out of the race, Edwards and his
wife Elizabeth appeared at the closing of his campaign headquarters in Chapel Hill. Nothing has been posted on his campaign Web site since Jan. 30.
Remaining
democratic candidates Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have met with Edwards,
hoping to gain his endorsement and the 18 delegates from South
Carolina, Iowa and New Hampshire.
There was widespread speculation both Obama and Clinton
offered Edwards' a cabinet position (attorney general).
Since then, Edwards has rarely (I can't remember any) appeared
in public. I'm certain the exile is self-imposed,
but has he waited so long that he's lost some of his clout as a party leader?
Granted, I'm light years from Edwards' inner circle, but we
live in a world of perceived reality.
Is Edwards waiting until closer to the May 6 primary here in
North Carolina? There's just something unusual about quiet
politicians, even those who are no longer candidates.
Do Your Homework
Apr 21, 2008 | 4:27 PM PST
Category:
Political
Choosing which candidate for president or governor to vote
for in the May 6 primary is easy. The
candidates in these two races are literally spending the most time getting your
attention through TV and online ads, e-mails, phone calls and old-fashioned
face-to-face campaigning.
These are also a small percentage of choices you will have
to make between now and May 6. In
addition to statewide offices, who will earn your vote for State Supreme Court Associate
Justice, Court of Appeals or District Court?
Which judicial candidates are republican or democrat?
OK, that was a trick question. Judicial candidates are non-partisan, which
means they will appear on all ballots, whether you're red, blue or independent.
Give these candidates your serious consideration and don't
go blindly into the election booth. Check out this story on myfoxwghp.com or the Board of Elections in your
county. WARNING: This will mean doing something than sitting
in front of the television or checking your e-mail. Do more than use your Google search bar. Take the time to get involved. In this information age, being under-informed
is as bad as being uninformed.
Taking on Liddy
Apr 14, 2008 | 11:35 PM PST
Category:
Political
I promised awhile back to focus more on statewide and local
races, but it's been awfully tempting to weigh in on the presidential primary.
(especially when Hillary Clinton calls Barack Obama 'an elitist'). I'll write about the presidential race later
this week.
I was disappointed to hear Kay Hagan's decision April 11 not
to debate fellow democratic candidates who hope to challenge incumbent Sen.
Elizabeth Dole this fall. Challenger Jim
Neal wasted little time in attacking Hagan's decision. As a side not, Neal's campaign responds to any
news (and its appropriate spin) in quick fashion. Last week, WTVD-TV released poll results showing
virtually no change in the race in the past 60 days: Hagan and Neal were in a statistical dead
heat (21-20 percent with a 3 percent margin of error). The news release failed to mention both
candidates trailed 'undecided' by 20 points.
High undecideds show neither Hagan, Neal, Duskin Lassiter, Marcus
Williams or Howard Staley are making much of an impression on likely voters. Once we get through the primary, this race
will heat up considerably, because national democrats believe Sen. Dole is
vulnerable. The president and governor
races will be the hottest, with this race likely running third in impact (the
combination of buzz, TV ads and shouting heads).
Up next, the race for governor ... and a few thoughts on the
prez primary.
May 6 - The Other Races
Mar 11, 2008 | 3:42 PM PST
Category:
Political
I have spent a lot of time (and words) talking about the
presidential horse race in recent months.
White House wanna-bes will be only one of several choices North Carolina voters will have to decide on
May 6.
My promise to you is to spend more time studying up on local
and statewide races, plus local bond proposals and issues. I will share what I learn on my blog. I would like your input on the issues that
interest you most. You can respond by
commenting to this blog or e-mail me at alan.hobbs@foxtv.com.
Thank you in advance for your time and interest.
Play the Game
Mar 3, 2008 | 4:37 PM PST
Category:
Political
It
all comes down to Super Tuesday: Part Deux. Based on the talking heads and wagging tongues,
Obama/Clinton and McCain/Huckabee should be settled once and for all by
Wednesday, March 5.
Forget
voters in the remaining states, such as North
Carolina May 6.
Let's get all this over with now as soon as possible.
What's
the hurry?
Friday,
February 29 on Fox News Channel's Hannity & Colmes, a patient Mike Huckabee
answered Sean Hannity's every conceivable variation of "Why don't you just
quit now?" Huckabee's answer was
simple, when John McCain wins 1,191 delegates, he'll concede the race. Huckabee gets it.
New
Mexico Governor (and former democratic presidential candidate) Bill Richardson
said Sunday that whoever leads the delegate count after the Ohio, Texas, Rhode
Island and Vermont primaries should be the party's nominee.
Again,
what's the hurry?
If
you follow this logic, why did they even bother to play Super Bowl XLII? New England had not lost a game all season
(including beating opponent New York Giants) and was the popular choice among
those taking and placing odds on the game (for entertainment purposes only, of
course). Yet they went ahead and played
the game anyway, which the underdog Giants won.
For additional sports analogies, see Arkansas
vs. LSU (Arkansas
50-48, 3OT). Sorry, I couldn't resist
getting that one in.
The races
are over when McCain gets 1,191 and either Obama or Clinton reach 2,025 pledged delegates to
their respective party's convention.
Why
is everyone in such a hurry to end the process that is only entering its third
month? There's plenty of time between
now and the conventions late this summer.
The race keeps the dialogue going, keeps people talking about the issues
and makes politicians answer our questions.
Since when did pols decide they needed to talk less? Politics is a blood sport. It's all about wins and losses. Anyone who doesn't keep score is either a
neophyte, wanna-be or a Green party member.
A
final note about Super Tuesday: Part
Deux. For the first time in years, Texas is a player in
primary politics. I can't think about Texas politics without
hearing Molly Ivins' voice. She wrote
with the perfect southern drawl. Molly was
the best at dissecting political bluster (the nicest 'b' word I can come up
with).
When
the candidates, or the talking heads for that fact, get too loud, start looking
for a pony. Molly once wrote about looking
far and wide for a pony while amongst a group of politicians. Finally, one of them asked what she was
looking for, she explained "with all this horse... (manure) there's got to
be one around here somewhere." It
loses some of its punch in translation, but you get the point.
Former Winston-Salem
city council member Vernon Robinson ran for U.S. House of Representatives in
the last two elections. He lost by a 2-to-1
margin against democrat incumbent Rep. Brad Miller (13th District) in
2006. Two years earlier, he lost to
fellow republican Virginia Foxx in a runoff for the 5th District
opening created when Richard Burr ran for (and won) the race for U.S. Senate.
Since his loss to Miller, Mr. Robinson has remained uncharacteristically
quiet. His Web site http://www.vernonrobinson.com/ currently
touts Ron Paul's presidential candidacy.
Whether you agreed with his politics or not, Robinson took
a scorched earth approach to campaigning.
His media campaigns were almost always met with a "what is he
claiming now?" curiosity, a very effective advertising method. His ads always made for good theatre.
It's hard to believe after Robinson dropped off the
political radar after two such high-profile campaigns. Maybe he'll show up this week, now that candidates for
political offices have begun filing for races.
Let's hope so, if only for entertainment purposes.
Mr.
Robinson, we would love to have you join the MyFoxWGHP.com Blog
community. I think you could provide interesting insight and original
content on what's going to be an interesting year in American politics.
Let the Good Times Roll
Feb 4, 2008 | 7:36 PM PST
Category:
Political
I love the fact Super Tuesday and Mardi Gras fall on the same day this year.
While revelers in New Orleans and other parts of the country let the good times roll all day long, candidates and supporters must wait until the polls close to determine how much they can celebrate.
In New Orleans, Fat Tuesday ends promptly at midnight, when police officially close Bourbon Street. City workers follow close behind, using large trucks and high-pressure water hoses to clean the streets. Years ago, one sign of Mardi Gras success was measured by how many much garbage (in tons) was collected on Ash Wednesday. The PC cops killed that tradition off in the mid-90s.
Tuesday, political junkies will gorge themselves on exit polls, delegate counts and primary/caucus analysis. Beginning Wednesday, many Christians will spend the following 40 days fasting and in prayer before Easter. During that time, politicos will have to survive on leaner fare (smaller groups of primaries). There's a red meat analogy there, but I can't find the right words.
Candidates, who have emptied their war chests for Super Tuesday, will fast on spending over the next 40 days, except in the 12 states holding primaries/caucuses. Efforts to raise the money won't.
The celebration on Easter (March 23) marks the end of Lent. Will either party have their nominee sewn up in the next 41 days? Personally, I hope not, because North Carolina's primary is May 6. We began 2008 thinking the party would be over by the time it got here. Now, we may get to sit at the table with the grown-ups. We can only hope by then, candidates will throw us some cash like people will be throwing beads, doubloons and other shiny objects off of Mardi Gras floats Tuesday. Let the good times roll a little longer.
Here are the results of the latest MyFoxWGHP.com poll question:
What
domestic issue is most important to you when choosing a presidential candidate?
Illegal
immigrants 43.23%
Economy 40.00%
Abortion 6.71%
Education 5.34%
Gun
control 2.59%
Free
trade 2.13%
Total
number of votes: 655
Thanks for playing!
Congratulations
to voters in Iowa and New Hampshire who were interested and
motivated enough to actually do something.
We can only hope this is a sign of things to come through the remainder
of the primary/caucus process. These
folks are actually interested in the politics, what a concept.
This ends
the retail portion of our political program.
From here on out, it's wholesale.
Expect to see a lot of campaign ads on the cable news channels leading
up to the 27-state Super Tuesday on February 5.
Before then, South Carolina
voters will write the next chapter. We'll
soon find out if favorite son Edwards or neighbor Thompson will get their first
wins. Both need a first or second place
finish to stay in the race. Edwards has
a stronger chance of winning South
Carolina than Thompson, but both face rising tides of
momentum fueled by Obama and Huckabee.
Despite wins in New Hampshire by Clinton
and McCain Tuesday, Iowa's
winners are the key palmetto state players.
Candidate Matchmaker
Dec 21, 2007 | 4:55 PM PST
Category:
Political
We've got a new feature on the MyFoxWGHP.com Politics page I hope you'll check out. The name Candidate Matchmaker is self-explanatory.
Compare your position on key political issues with those of current presidential candidates. The matchmaker allows you to play 20 questions to find your closest political match and dig deeper into the candidates' answers, stances and news coverage.
The questions cover individual rights, domestic, economic, defense and international issues. For each question, you rank your approval, opposition, or choose to have no opinion.
The wording of a few of the phrases is interesting. Here are two Jason and I discussed after taking the quiz:
Drug use is immoral: enforce laws against it
Whether it is immoral or not, drug use is
against the law. Should we not enforce laws against something you consider moral?
Allow churches to provide welfare servicesChurches already provide these services. Who would be against churches (or anybody) providing food for needy people? The phrase's intent seems to be either churches or the government.
Jason and I each took the test and were surprised by the results. We're not exact opposites on the political spectrum, but neither do we row in the same boat. We each took it three times, and by modifying our answers, got a different result each time. Our new web producer, Dara, was also surprised by her results.
Take the quiz
http://election.myfoxwghp.com and share your results with us.
| Page 1 of 2 |
1 |
2 |
 |
Last |